Skip to content

Better regex parsing in annotation range #515

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 8, 2025
Merged

Better regex parsing in annotation range #515

merged 2 commits into from
May 8, 2025

Conversation

pomber
Copy link
Contributor

@pomber pomber commented May 8, 2025

Now, regex in annotation ranges allow escaped [] and ().

So it supports cases like this:

```jsx
// !Fold[/className="([^"]+)"/g]
function Foo() {
  return (
    <div className="bg-red-200 opacity-50">
      <span className="border">hey</span>
    </div>
  )
}
```

@vercel Vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented May 8, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
codehike.org ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback May 8, 2025 11:50am

@github-actions github-actions bot added the changeset PR including changesets label May 8, 2025
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented May 8, 2025

Try codehike from this pull request in your project with:

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/codehike@515

@pomber pomber mentioned this pull request May 8, 2025
Closed
@pomber pomber merged commit eb1a4ba into next May 8, 2025
4 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request May 8, 2025
Merged
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the changeset PR including changesets label May 13, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@pomber